The Persuasive Speech

Formatting: Single-spaced, 1-inch margins, Times New Roman, 12 pt. font, submitted in eLearning Dropbox in .doc, .docx, .pdf, or .rtf format (NOT .pages or .odt) and an in-class performance

Length: 5 minutes in length, so approximately 500 – 750 words

Bibliographic Documentation: A Works Cited page is required in MLA or APA style. You will need to reference three credible sources, one of which should ideally argue the counterargument from your speech. In-text citation is not required.

Overview

Even when a writer has a personal motive for composing an essay, to remember, to reflect, to meditate, for catharsis, a writer also almost always wants to create an effect on her or his audience: to entertain, to educate, to move the reader. In our third unit, we will focus on a genre of essays with one clear intention: to persuade. We will shift focus to an oral genre of writing: the persuasive speech. Most often, a speech is written with a large, even global audience in mind in today’s televised and digitized age, so it’s unlikely that a speech writer wants to alienate her or his audience. More likely, she or he wants to win the audience over, thus winning them over to a cause as well. A good speech wins an audience over with its logic, but a good speaker wins an audience over just as much with tone, credibility, charisma, and eloquence. Let me emphasize again that we’re working in an oral medium for this unit. This is writing for the ears rather than the eyes, so the writing should be clear and dynamic in a single performance. Reading aloud and listening to the eloquence of sentences is fundamental to this particular writing process. As you compose your speeches, we will read and watch several examples in the genre that employ a variety of tones and argumentation styles.

The Task

Your task is to write a persuasive speech on a topic of your choice. The most obvious topics are often explicitly political, but don’t rule out topics that aren’t as overtly political, such as debates on WMU’s campus or debates in the consumer marketplace like the one over net neutrality. I will encourage you to focus on a less common debate, because it’s more likely to be new to the class and therefore more interesting. Some debates are just so common that I’m ruling them out: abortion, the death penalty, gun control, marijuana legalization, and homosexual marriage. I’d also encourage you to be as specific as possible in your choice of debate. For instance, rather than write on education reform, write on teachers’ salaries or the new Common Core program. Most likely, you will have to do some initial exploratory research to narrow your speech’s focus. I am also asking that you research three credible sources for your speech, one of which should ideally argue the counterargument from your stance. I ask that you do not use websites, documentaries, or reference books like encyclopedias as your scholarly sources; your best bet will be scholarly journal articles. Databases such as CQ Researcher, PAIS International, and LexisNexis Academic focus on public affairs. I will allow popular newspapers and magazines, but please do consider bias, in any of your sources. For instance, we all know that TV stations like Fox News have a political agenda. The same is true of all media.

At the end of the unit, you will present your speech to the class, so please keep this presentation in mind as you compose. Read your draft out loud as you compose and edit your sentences to sound as eloquent as possible. As you read out loud, you might discover quirks in your own writing style like wordiness, sentence fragments, and misplaced commas that you can finesse.

Analytic Research Essay

Formatting: Single-spaced, one-inch margins, Times New Roman, 12 pt. font, uploaded to eLearning Dropbox in either .doc, .docx, or .rtf format (NOT .pages or .odt)

Length: At least 2 full-length, single-spaced pages

Bibliographic Documentation: A Works Cited page is required in MLA or APA style. You will need to reference three sources: one primary source and two secondary sources. In-text citation is not required.

Overview

When you write a research essay, you are joining a conversation with the writers of the past. Yes, you include those other writers’ voices, but you should always want the last word. Like any good conversation, you and your sources will have agreements and disagreements, as your interpretations are informed by your own unique experiences and perceptions. Often, our interpretations reveal just as much about ourselves as they reveal about the object of interpretation. We will read several examples of essays in which the authors use research to explore themselves and the unique way that they view the world.

In our second unit, we will review the basic research skills necessary for writing university-level research papers, including the difference between primary and secondary sources, venues for scholarly books and articles, and citation styles. We will then discuss different strategies to think and write more analytically, such as metacognition, or an awareness and understanding of one’s own thought processes; introspection, or an examination of one’s own thought processes; and extrospection, or an examination of the world outside one’s self. You will then use these discussions to spark an analytic essay.

The Task

You will choose a piece of art in any medium, whether it’s dance, drama, film, music, photography, painting, mixed media, architecture, performance art, poetry, prose, or another medium of your choosing, that you will then analyze in a short essay. To supplement your own analysis, you will research two scholarly sources that interpret the artwork you have chosen. Your research paper should not simply summarize or describe the plot or appearance of your artwork; neither should it simply summarize the interpretations of your scholarly sources. Rather, you should speak to whether or not you agree with the interpretations of your scholars and propose your own analysis of the artwork. Think of the difference between summary and analysis in the context of ESPN: when sportscasters are telling what happened in the game from the night beforehand, they are summarizing; when they draw arrows and circles on play-by-play film to understand why one team won, they are analyzing. Begin writing this paper as though your audience is already very familiar with your artwork.

Because your personal interpretation is the emphasis here, I am looking for the “I” in this essay. Be yourself, and be honest about being yourself. Let your own voice and biases shine through. If you want to use the lessons of the personal essay unit, such as scene, imagery, and dialogue, in your essay, feel free. I am not looking for in-text citation in this essay, as you should use the interpretations of your scholars merely as a springboard for your own interpretations. I ask, however, that you do not use websites, documentaries, or reference books like encyclopedias as your scholarly sources; your best bet will be book chapters and scholarly journal articles. I also ask that you choose a piece of artwork concise enough to do justice to in two or three pages. A novel or TV series is almost certainly too long to cover. Remember that there have been full-length books written about single paintings or poems. Analysis is an infinitely deep rabbit hole.